Closed paulvinell closed 4 months ago
Hello @paulvinell, thank you for opening this issue. Indeed, you are right! 😁
We are aware of this change w.r.t. the original architecture. The motivation is because we faced some problems in replicating the original structure, in particular, we couldn't get it to converge properly. For sure, we can try again to have another look at it and with a fresh mind find a solution.
Anyway, if you'd like, and if maybe you've already thought about how to modify the code to add a new encoder, feel free to give it a try. We would welcome any valuable input to improve the work.
Since there has been no further activity on this issue, I will proceed to close this issue.
If you have any additional insights or further suggestions on how we can improve the implementation, please feel free to open a new issue or reach out to us directly.
I found this repository from your study "A Survey on GANs for Anomaly Detection". Wanting to reimplement the GANomaly model, I've been looking at your implementation. Upon comparison to the original study and code, it seems that the implementation of GANomaly is incorrect.
It seems that you have only one instance of the encoder, whereas the original study has two instances. Moreover, they say the following in the original GANomaly paper:
This seems like an issue that could compromise the study results.