Open ghost opened 3 years ago
When there will be an explicit license specified for the project I can continue moving used tools (often duplicated all over the project's folders) into a single SDK with proper copyright and licensing notices. This will ease further development. Thank you for understanding.
Use GPLv3 as default as I said because it's the one used by McLeod on his core and I have not preferences on my tools
Ok. I'll continue adding provided sources from you under GPLv3.
There is no license text at all and the text in the
readme.md
file says that "License is Creative Commons by SA" but what did author mean? There are several versions of CC BY-SA: be specific about which Creative Commons license is being used. The absence of the clear license text may prevent developers from contributing to this project. The most recent one is Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International which is marked as "libre" at SPDX licenses list. We may choose that license by default for all files with no copyright and licensing information embedded. The simplest way is to modify the text inreadme.md
file like this:markdown format:
preview:
When contributing to this project I follow REUSE recomendations on how to specify copyright and licensing information (at least in
sdk
folder of this project). For example:sdk/README.md
sdk/README.md.license
The decision must be done by the respective owners of affected parts of this project.