According to the UG, an employee is a duplicate if "there is someone in the database who already shares the same name, phone number and email". However, adding an employee with the name "e" then adding an employee with the name "E" is allowed although they are duplicates. This is a problem as users might enter the same user twice, but with different capitalisations. (e.g. "Mark Twain" and "Mark twain").
According to the UG, an employee is a duplicate if "there is someone in the database who already shares the same name, phone number and email". However, adding an employee with the name "e" then adding an employee with the name "E" is allowed although they are duplicates. This is a problem as users might enter the same user twice, but with different capitalisations. (e.g. "Mark Twain" and "Mark twain").
To replicate: