Open aureliojargas opened 1 year ago
Just came across this feature request. I think it would be a fine feature. Although I think the value of colorcolumn
should be not an array of numbers but a simple comma-separated string of numbers, for compatibility and user convenience reasons.
"colorcolumn": "50,72"
This is not a high priority for us right now, but this should be easy to implement, so maybe let's add it to the v2.0.14
milestone right away.
Although I think the value of
colorcolumn
should be not an array of numbers but a simple comma-separated string of numbers, for compatibility and user convenience reasons.
Hmm, actually even that would not be backwards compatible, since currently the value of colorcolumn
in settings.json
is a number, not a string, and currently micro requires any standard option's value to have the same type all the time, it doesn't provide "dynamic typing" for that. So it's not so easy.
Having multiple highlighted columns is useful in some cases.
For example, Git commit messages usual practice: first line 50 columns, body text 72 columns.
In Python, the
black
formatter defaults to 88 columns for code, but for the docstrings and comments, our team prefers breaking them at 80 columns.In general, 80 columns is what I like to have, for any other file type.
This is a similar request to the rejected #2694, but my proposal here would be simpler: no new/renamed commands, no user-noticeable changes on the use of
set colorcolumn
.We could keep the interactive use as it is, aiming for the simple/common case:
set colorcolumn <integer>
to set it to a specific column, or zero to turn it off. No changes here.But, if the user has manually changed the
settings.json
file and set the value to a list of numbers, those will be respected.If this makes more sense, maybe it could be valid only for scoped settings (
ft:
and glob), since those are already not changed by the interactiveset
command.Would that be acceptable?