Comments and Suggestions

[zziz]

Please add your comments and suggestions for improving this repository.

- Which conference/journal papers would you like to see? - What area of Machine Learning is a priority for you? - What area of Machine Learning is missing from this repository? - Do you want to contribute? How can you contribute? - Your general comment/opinion for improving this repository. - Any other form of feedback/comment.

No spam, please.

[xgfs]

Are you sure the code for the "product split trees" is correct?

[zziz]

Thank you for pointing that out @xgfs I just fixed it.

[EricGzq]

I think you can divide these codes into categories.

[zziz]

Thanks for your feedback @EricGzq! What exactly do you have in mind? What kind of categories?

[monperrus]

Awesome idea, +1 for open-science.

It would be great to have such a repo for papers in other research communities, such as software engineering. How to proceed? with a new page here?

[zziz]

Thanks for your feedback @monperrus! Sounds promising! Since there are some remaining works to be done here, for now, I have just focused on Machine Learning. After finishing ML, I will move to other research communities. If you want to contribute for say Software Engineering, please do so. Just add a markdown file (such as SoftwareEngineering.md), I will include a link to that in main README file.

[Bachstelze]

I didn't checked all papers, but i looks like their almost all about visual or general ML. An other catogorie then would be NLP.

[zziz]

Thanks for your feedback @Bachstelze! Right now I'm working on the code which I use to maintain this repository. I will include more conferences and journals as soon as I can. NLP, Reinforcement Learning, Speech Processing and other areas of Signal processing and Machine Learning will be included. Plus I will upload all the code and data that is being for this repository.

[ghost]

@zziz Can I work on the categories part?

[monperrus]

With respect to the research areas, one way would be to create alternative repositories, such as pwc-se for software engineering.

This would the equivalent of awesome lists referring to awesome-awesome.

[xeoncross]

Could we separate the papers by year, then by broad categories?

• Image
• Video
• Text
• 3D

Or

• NLP
• Signal Processing
• Algorithms

I realize there is some overlap (Speech-to-text), but at least I could filter through the articles quicker.

[zziz]

Sounds like categorizing is interesting for a lot of people (@monperrus and @Xeoncross also I got some offline comments about it). I will work on it - namely include papers for each category into CATEGORY.md file. The main page will still have all of them together as it does now - I don't want to overcomplicate the main README page.

[zziz]

Dear @MONIKA-KUMAR-JETHANI, you are welcome to work on categorizing part. I have included the raw csv file in /src folder. I will update that file as we go on. But in any case, it can be a starting point for you.

[YoRobotCop]

Newbe thanks for supporting!!!

[furkanusta]

There is https://researchcode.com/ that is similar. Maybe you can put a link to it at the end

[monperrus]

Is the data behind https://researchcode.com/ publicly available (as here)?

[zziz]

Dear @furkanusta, thank you for letting me know about it. I have came to know two other similar websites as well (paperswithcode.com and gitxiv.com). I will include all of them in main page soon.

[zziz]

@monperrus I'm not sure, but I don't think so. They might some day, hopefully.

[iphysresearch]

As https://paperswithcode.com , It would be better to mark the DL library for each paper, like TensorFlow, Pytorch, MXNet, ...

[zziz]

Dear @iphysresearch thank you very much for your recommendation. Right now I'm working on collecting papers with code from different conferences. After this stage I will work on categorizing the papers as well as tagging them (which will include implementation framework too).

[raincrash]

Hi @zziz. What are your thoughts on building a GitHub pages site? I think it would be easier to implement tags, have an option to search etc in the future. (PS: I could help build one too.)

[zziz]

Dear @raincrash, sounds great! Let's make it! Let's discuss it over an email or conference call.

[Quantumofcosmos]

I can help in building

• GitHub pages site
• Implementation framework tagging on the markdown itself

That is after you take call on what you want to do first. @zziz

[zziz]

Dear @Quantumofcosmos, at this point I'm focused on collecting data basically. Add more papers and codes to the list. This weekend I will discuss website plans with @raincrash. You are welcome to join our discussion (if @raincrash approves of course :) ).

[raincrash]

Hi! Sure! Also, @zziz, how are you retrieving the star count? Thoughts on running a cron every week or something, use the GitHub Developer APIs and get the start count updated in the CSV? or are you already doing this?

[zziz]

Hi @raincrash. Yes, I update on Sundays. So tomorrow there will be an update. Yes I do use GitHub API :) Actually I'm going to open source entire system once it's done. Planning to do it till end of the year. Right now it's a bit messy, complicated and many things yet to be implemented :)

[valentincalomme]

I've read through the comments but for emphasis, I will probably repeat some points already made. Here are some additions that I would love to see:

• An additional column for the programming language
• Whether the code is "dockerized"
• Be able to filter/sort the content
• Perhaps some meta-data (broad ML category for instance)
• Adding a link validation script to help identify links that no longer work

[dJOKERdUMMY]

Year 2014 , project Tell Me What You See and I will Show You Where It Is , the link to the code seems wrong. Please correct it if it is.

[justanhduc]

I think BMVC is also a good conference to track? Edit: I noticed there is no ICLR either.

[jindongwang]

Thanks @zziz for this great repo! I find it very confusing when I want to contribute to this repo. Do I have to update the readme.md or the src folder? I think it's better if you make the pull request more clear, then everyone interested can contribute, which is more efficient.

[D-X-Y]

ICLR 2019 and CVPR 2019 have released their final decisions. Maybe it's time to include some works published in 2019?

[shirazi138354]

hello I wanted to know if the code for this article is here, and what do you recommend for 2018 to identify the face that Mattl's code has?

[mcharrak]

Agree with D-X-Y. ICLR papers and code could be added as it is one of the top conferences on a par with ICML and NIPS.

[fisforfaheem]

updates>