Open zzybluebell opened 2 years ago
as "te/" is considered a parameter, the tester is passing it twice.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: It has never been indicated the address
can't contain the prefix te/
. it should explain or indicate Prefix is now allowed in Address String
in error message or UG
Team chose [severity.Low
]
Originally [severity.VeryLow
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
Never indicate the String can't be inputted within the address String
in UG or
The error message has never indicate this.
Error message output wrong, and never indicate the address cant include "n/ a/" this kind of prefix