Closed jarroda closed 7 years ago
Do it!
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Jarrod Alexander notifications@github.com wrote:
Some of the underlying providers no longer provide non-async APIs, so the synchronous support in 2020 storage is a bit of a hack. I propose dropping the non-async API for 2020 storage. Any objections to this?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/2020IP/TwentyTwenty.Storage/issues/5, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APNHsNy2vHTermfI3B6JFjqsFYqZpkfUks5q099AgaJpZM4KZFnP .
[image: 2020 Research Logo]
Andrew Albright | Software Application Engineer andrewa@2020research.com | 615.777.2020
20|20 Research 161 Rosa L. Parks Blvd. | Nashville, TN 37203 | USA www.2020research.com
+1
This is now in dev branch.
Some of the underlying providers no longer provide non-async APIs, so the synchronous support in 2020 storage is a bit of a hack. I propose dropping the non-async API for 2020 storage. Any objections to this?