Adapt map and stagerred plots without financial data to run on transition risk score only for portfolio level

[AnneSchoenauer]

We have a new variable which is called transition risk score. Let's discuss how to adapt the graphs to also picture the transition risk score in the graphs.

[maurolepore]

Seems like a better fit for tiltPlot.

[Tilmon]

@AnneSchoenauer pls think about this task as discussed in the tech sprint

[AnneSchoenauer]

Dear @lindadelacombaz, I think we should do the following: The transition_risk_score is a number between 0 and 1. It is similiar to the profile_ranking for the emission profile. For the emission_profile we say that every product lower than 0.333 is low, between 0.333-0.667 is medium and above 0.667 is high. I think we should do the same for the transition risk score. Could you therefore:

1) Add one column in the toy data that says transition_risk_score_category and add either "low", "medium", "high" to it depending on the size of the transition_risk_score. I will make sure that you will receive the "real" toy data soon - but I think it will take 2 more weeks for sure. 2) With this the transition_risk_score should work exactly the same as the emission_profile - so you could make sure that the staggered_plot and the sankey_plot work already the same. Also the map as it is right now. 3) The map: The map would also work the same. But please note that we now figured out a way to receive our results with a number between 0-1. For the emission profile it is the profile_ranking and the transition_risk_score is orginally a number between 0-1. Soooo that means that we could adapt the maps accordingly again. Could you create a ticket in which we don't forget to adapt the map accordingly? Not a priority for now but good to not forget it.

I hope this helps a bit! If you have questions, please let me know! All the best Anne

[Tilmon]

@AnneSchoenauer will try on her own first.

[Tilmon]

@kalashsinghal please have a look at this ticket so that we can discuss in the tech sprint if you can take it over from @lindadelacombaz .

[AnneSchoenauer]

@lindadelacombaz and presumably @kalashsinghal. I summarise again whcih two plots we would need.

We want:

a) map - found here b) staggered bar plots for portfolio level here.

To re-cap we only need the plots

• WITHOUT financial data.
• ONLY on portfolio level (not on company level)
• suitable to run on transition_risk_score_categories, emission_profile_category and sector_profile_category (so on the low, medium and high categories)

@lindadelacombaz could you decide if for the map it would be easier if we take the number between 0-1 which would be for the transition_risk_score, the transition_risk_score value, for the emission_profile the profile_ranking and for the sector_profile the reduction_targets.

Thanks both of you and if there is anything unclear, plesae let me know.

[lindadelacombaz]

Hey @AnneSchoenauer and maybe @kalashsinghal, since the map already take a number between 0-1 for the emission_profile / profile_ranking scores, it will be easily adaptable to run on the transition_risk_score value and reduction_targets value.