-
Hi!
1) CC website says that its [licences are not suitable for sotwares](https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-software)
2) Does generated outputs images fal…
-
Given the nature of the project we should change the license to `MPL-2.0`.
@Grufoony @NotLudovico can you comment with "yes" to confirm that you agree (IANAL but this is needed because `GPL` is copyl…
-
This repository contains several files called `js/main.js` across a few branches, and across several different directories per branch.
I am the original author of `js/main.js`, although due to that fi…
ghost updated
10 years ago
-
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
To quote from the website:
> You are free to:
>
> Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> Adapt — remix, transform, a…
-
-
Version 2.5 India licenses have "a" through "j" in Definitions section, but they seem to have skipped term/condition 1c (i.e. "c" in Definitions section), though this has been long since 2007/2008
* …
gho87 updated
13 hours ago
-
This is needed to support a lot of imagery that is compatible with OSM.
Specifically DG or Planet, they are both cc-by-nc+osm
Someone said this was coded but not merged.
-
### Description
This code snippet:
~~~
/*
* Simple square root algorithm. This is from:
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1623375/writing-your-own-square-root-function
* Written by…
-
Thank you for this awesome project!
However, this repository is licensed under CC-BY-NC, which does not satisfy the definition of Open Source by the Open Source Initiative (section 6 in particular…
-
LICENSE_WEIGHTS [CC-BY-NC 4.0]
As said in here, it is only for NON-COMMERCIAL purpose ,but the overall LICENSE comes under MIT [which is open for commercial purpose] ,so the question is , Has the W…