-
Hi, We have version 1.0.3 in big monorepo and its working fine. Our setup is simple, we have this package as devDep in some packages that opted for code coverage along with config/coverage.js.
When…
-
**Description of issue or feature request**:
@joshuagl has recently overhauled sslib's extra dependency handling. This included the configuration of different tests for different sets of installed de…
-
Tried `include-hidden-files: true` and it worked as expected.
Tried to rename the coverage file and the workflow fails as if it is not finding the files
```
- name: Rename coverage file
e…
-
See:
- https://plugins.jenkins.io/code-coverage-api/
- https://www.jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/steps/code-coverage-api/
- https://github.com/jenkinsci/code-coverage-api-plugin/wiki
- https://www.jenki…
-
### Environment
* OS Version: Windows 11
* Node.js Version: 20.15.0
Works fine on non-Windows, e.g. Mac. `convertPathToPattern` checks OS so reproduces only on Windows.
### Actual behav…
-
I think the Node.js coverage reporter should include support for reporting statement coverage.
My idea is to parse the source code into an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) using `acorn-walk`, and then us…
-
Hi,
yesterday I opened https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet/issues/1677, which i further investigated today, because the title + text are complelty different I choosed to close the old one…
-
Currently the code coverage of pinot repo is just around 50% ([Link](https://codecov.io/github/apache/pinot)).
This issue tracks the status of increasing code coverage.
The following modules curr…
-
**Describe the bug**
When running the sfp apextests trigger command, if there are LOCKED_ROW errors due to parallel testing, the failed tests rerun in serial mode (and that works fine).
Issue is that,…
-
Hey, tried your solutions, worked fine for components tests. But when I would like to try for e2e after runing dev server `npm run dev` e2e test is not instrumented so there is no window.__coverage__ …
ogous updated
4 weeks ago