-
Implement the ring of Puiseux polynomials. Those are usual
polynomials, except that exponents can be any rational number.
```
sage: S = PolynomialRing(QQ, ['a','b','c']); S
Multivariate Puise…
-
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-09 11:20:50
Created by **[rayon340](https://sourceforge.net/u/rayon340/)** on 2023-12-28 17:10:23
Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/4231
---
Dear e…
-
One would expect the performance of casting the usual way (as in test 1 below) to be at least not much worse than test 2:
```
sage: QQX=QQ['x']
sage: QP=Qp(3,30);
sage: R=QP.residue_field();
sage: …
-
### Steps To Reproduce
```sage
sage: R = PolynomialRing(QQ,"x,y")
....: R("+".join(["x"]*10000))
```
### Expected Behavior
`10000*x`
### Actual Behavior
```
----------------------------------…
-
In the past (i.e., some months ago), functions `polyfit`, `polyval`, etc. worked. I have the impression that `polyfit` has been replaced by `fit`, and that `polyval` has been eliminated.
I have tri…
B-LIE updated
3 years ago
-
Chebyshev polynomials should be drop-in replaceable with Legendre ones. Right now it doesn't work, the curves go crazy pretty quick.
-
From /roadmap: Simplify presentation of Hecke field (adjoin all elements to get an order, or mimic classical modular forms by working with the dual).
-
### Steps To Reproduce
The following code prints `False`, which is clearly wrong. At the same time, removing `order=f'degrevlex(1),degrevlex(2)'` from the ring `K` definition makes things work as exp…
-
Simplify doesn't seem to be working properly T-T
For example x^2+2x+1 gives x^2+2x+1 instead of (x+1)^2, and 5x+25 gives me 5x+25 instead of 5(x+5).
Expand works fine though, (x+1)^2 turns into …
-
Imported from SourceForge on 2024-07-09 16:32:31
Created by **[robert_dodier](https://sourceforge.net/u/robert_dodier/)** on 2006-03-26 01:58:45
Original: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/889
--…