-
Ref. https://old.reddit.com/r/computervision/comments/1e3uxro/ultralytics_new_agpl30_license_exploiting/
> According to Ultralytics, both the training code and the models produced by that code are …
-
Here in Github it is stated that the project is under GPL 2.0. But this seems only half of the truth. Looking deeper into the project it seems that the directory ``inc`` and ``lib`` are licensed under…
-
It protect the project from causing any damage
Please assign me the issue
@Ramsey99
-
This codebase has no license. It would be great if could you add a license. Almost all source code files have a license, but not all of the source code files, unfortunately. It may be easier if in ad…
-
Hi! I'm considering packaging this project for Debian, since it appears to be required for the `age` self-tests in v1.2.0. The alternative is to patch `age` to avoid using this package, but that doe…
-
**Describe the bug**
`xray_license_policy` resource is getting stuck infinitely when trying to `import` or `plan` a resource with plenty `allowed_licenses` . Currently have `2000+` allowed_licenses.
…
-
cant download anything without a premium license..
-
Without a license, we open ourselves up to various legal issues.
My personal recommendation is Apache 2.0.
-
It protect the project from causing any damage
Please assign me the issue
-
Hi,
Thanks for releasing this framework!
Are there any plans to switch to an open source license?
Thanks!