-
BPO | [45435](https://bugs.python.org/issue45435)
--- | :---
Nosy | @pitrou, @stevendaprano, @serhiy-storchaka, @jeff5, @graingert, @pablogsal, @bensimner
PRs | python/cpython#28886
*Note: these valu…
-
- Cf. https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/Forum/discussions/134
- Chain an atomic swap with other Counterparty transactions
- Real-world cost analysis for all operations
- Static vs dynamic XCP fees…
-
-
-
As per https://datasheets.raspberrypi.org/rp2040/rp2040-datasheet.pdf "2.1.2. Atomic Register Access"
This looks vaguely similar to something that was done for the `msp430`. Unsure how common …
-
```
Not sure how important it is, but for what it's worth:
Racy use-after-free in the following code is never detected, as the second
access to *p is not instrumented.
void foo(long *p, long *q)
{
…
-
I am trying to implement a drop-in replacement PHP Class for Memcache using HandlerSocket, but there are a few technical problems that I can't seem to work around without using external locking mechan…
-
When we append to an existing table (whether partitioned or not), we should make sure the append is an atomic operation. We either fail without appending any data to the destination table or we succee…
-
```
Not sure how important it is, but for what it's worth:
Racy use-after-free in the following code is never detected, as the second
access to *p is not instrumented.
void foo(long *p, long *q)
{
…
-
```
Not sure how important it is, but for what it's worth:
Racy use-after-free in the following code is never detected, as the second
access to *p is not instrumented.
void foo(long *p, long *q)
{
…