-
The extension should follow the webextension standard and also work on Firefox
-
### MDN URL
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/manifest.json
### What specific section or headline is this issue about?
List of manifest.json keys
### W…
-
As stated in the title, I'm requesting that this extension gets published to Firefox Addons https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/. Given that the extension is already using the `webextension-polyf…
-
With Firefox 57 ("Quantum"), support forXUL/XPCOM overlays has been dropped, extensions have to use the new WebExtension API.
Could you be motivated to port this nice addon?
WebExtensions are somewh…
-
From https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2469#issuecomment-728911065:
> Ideally, the browser-side code (currently Mozilla AutoConfig) would be rewritten as a WebExtension and then used f…
-
WebExtensions will probably be the future way to develop add-ons (see https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/). Check if we can modify the Firefox WebExten…
-
I've just used kango to create an extension and I want to publish that extension in [https://addons.mozilla.org](url). But when I upload the .xpi file, I get the error `Starting with Firefox 53, new e…
-
**Summary:**
- I don’t use Chrome very much myself.
- Manifest V2 extensions will continue working in Firefox.
- I don’t have super much time to work on Link Hints.
- But I have a plan and I do …
-
Current version is not compatible with WebExtensions and Firefox 57. Fix it please.
-
The W3C will be holding [TPAC 2024](https://www.w3.org/2024/09/TPAC/) in Anaheim, CA, USA on September 23-27. This thread will serve as our primary discussion area for planning and scheduling purposes…