-
Hi Mattze96! Sorry for the interruption, but I just wanted to let you know about an upcoming license change for XOWA from AGPLv3 to dual-license GPLv3 / Apache2: https://github.com/gnosygnu/xowa/issue…
-
There is a bit of inconsistency in terms of what license BFG is licensed under. The headers of the files indicate "GPL version 3 or any later version". However, the contributing guidelines ask the de…
-
Re: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/blob/%40wordpress/scripts%407.1.2/packages/scripts/scripts/check-licenses.js#L36
May be related: #7821
**Describe the bug**
GPLv3+ should be recogni…
-
Hi there
Creative Commons says not to use this licence for software, you site the parent project as a reason but that uses GPLv3, you should move to GPLv3 or mixed-licensing if needed (e.g. for lo…
-
Just checking, seems like OAMI uses GPLv3, makes sense to stay consistent with that, right?
I prefer a copyleft license anyhow, and only wondering if we should use GPLv2 or GPLv3.
I'm fine with GPLv…
-
I've had some ideas on building a similar project. Now this project is licensed as GPLv3, it might be a good idea for us to combine our efforts to make things easier. Here's a summary of what I had in…
-
Hi,
this isn't a bug report but I noticed that you have licensed this project with MIT license. PyQt6 is licensed under GPLv3 which isn't compatible with MIT. I suggest you switch to GPLv3 for thi…
-
Hi,
This package is released under the GNU General Public License v3 and as a matter of fact that license might be a bit aggressive for some use-cases.
Is there is specific reason you choose to …
-
> As someone who previously used BSD-3 for my projects, I began to worry if tech geeks would take offence to it or not if I semi-automatically added content from other people's GPLv3 projects to them.…
-
Hi.
I know the license is GPLv3. However:
1) A license specified just in the package.json file is not really visible. Would you mind including the license text?
2) Would you mind specifying whe…