-
When you run `slather coverage -s` from the command-line, it shows around 70% test coverage. However, https://coveralls.io/r/intentkit/IntentKit is currently at 0%. What gives?
-
coveralls is called twice as reported in travis logs, and the second call (recomended by coveralls) seems quite futile (it just outputs some help/usage message), instead, the first call done by bashco…
-
Are there plans to support the JSON format described in the [API docs](https://docs.coveralls.io/api-introduction)? This format is internal generated from the lcov info file.
E.g. gcovr can create th…
-
Hi there!
Is there a way to post coverage from Github Actions in parallel mode?
Something like `mix coveralls.github --parallel true` and then setup another job sending the webhook to https://c…
-
Right now, the project's README file shows a hardcoded 100% coverage badge (see [here](https://github.com/Flexonze/django-auto-actions/blob/main/README.md?plain=1#L7)). To provide more accurate and dy…
-
https://docs.coveralls.io/
-
-
Probably related to the latest changes in travis-cargo.
-
Coveralls has stopped reporting results and is by that blocking pull requests we have 4 of them currently pending:
- https://github.com/tremor-rs/tremor-runtime/pull/1196
- https://github.com/trem…
-
Just a casual suggestion for the sole and maybe silly reason of consistency within the JuliaImages organisation.