-
Users hint at
http://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.cgi?tla=C4366
http://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.cgi?tla=C4683
probably actually being the same entry.
-
**Describe the bug**
Missing the definition for ϫⲟⲩϣⲧ
**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. https://coptic-dictionary.org/results.cgi?coptic=%CF%AB%E2%B2%9F%E2%B2%A9%CF%A3%E2%B2%A…
-
**TODO:**
- HTML code (which you write) is code, such as the Crum index page.
- Move CSS out of Crum's `index.html` file.
- Update the diagram to reflect the recent changes, such as the search engi…
-
Some kind of Rosetta stone like event?
Like the other revivalist cultures, it needs to be clear that this Neo-Coptic is a stew of revivalism, genuine ancient Coptic culture, and whatever happens to be…
-
This entry shows ⲡⲉⲗϭⲉ as the lemma and is missing the form ⲡⲗϭⲉ:
https://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.cgi?tla=C2826
However the form without the epsilon is actually listed as the lemma in Crum, …
-
There is a typo in the English definition of C282 - from should be form.
Also, should all of the definitions somehow mention ⲟⲩⲱϩ? e.g. "particle, reduced form of perfect participle of ⲟⲩⲱϩ"?
Cr…
-
[C1482](https://coptic-dictionary.org/entry.py?tla=C1482) has the lemma ϯ ⲉⲛⲕⲁϣ, but I suspect it should be ϯ ⲉⲡⲕⲁϣ (**ⲡ**, not **ⲛ**).
Sometimes in Crum those letters can be hard to distinguish, b…
-
English post-processing likely shouldn't apply to Coptic-within-English. Neither should Coptic-within-English be treated as words with spellings.
-
It appears to be the case that many (almost all?) Coptic words letters (in other words the Coptic font used) have not made it out of the CD into Alles.html in properly readable form.
http://beehive…
-
```
Issues on character character coverage, design and layout are reported in the
attached file.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `xian...@google.com` on 27 Mar 2015 at 11:06
Attac…