-
## Description
I am writing to bring to your attention an issue regarding the licensing of your project. It appears that the project includes a submodule licensed under the GNU General Public Licen…
-
Would you be open to adding `"license": "MIT"` to the package.json of all packages? This is selfish, I use a home-grown license scanner that looks for this field and I have add exceptions for vinxi pa…
-
It looks like RFCs are not licensed under any license. I propose to consult this case with RFCs authors and add a standard license such as Ruby/MIT or CC-BY license.
-
I have a `deny.toml` with `copyleft = "deny"` that simply means I can't use any dependency that is licensed under a copyleft license. So, even if I want to use headless_chrome since it is MIT licensed…
-
"The UpLicense gives you the right to use an product purchased from the Uplabs Store for personal use or as part of a commercial project, for yourself or a third party. However, the product cannot be …
-
If a license is only used in the `REUSE.toml` and not as a header/`.license`-file, `reuse download` will not download it and `reuse lint` will identify it as unused.
```bash
cd $(mktemp -d)
touch…
-
Seems, that the images in "Crafting an Interpreter" are no longer licensed under MIT but CC BY-NC-ND as of now: https://github.com/munificent/craftinginterpreters/commit/7afc5e090bf552f1bb5807e3999eae…
cagix updated
2 weeks ago
-
Hi @Doriandarko ,
amazing project, congratulations! Just a minor request: in the readme it mentions the work is licensed MIT and a license file. However, the file is missing in the repository. It w…
-
Hi,
Please let me know if this is licensed to MIT ?
-
Insightface is MIT licensed but there is no license associated with this project. No one should touch a project without first understanding its license, so this is a considerable barrier to adoption/u…