-
Actually, the test functions (functions with a directive `#[test]`) appear in the repport:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9797898/144179196-9e6ac70a-f16b-4289-8388-a457c991dfe2.pn…
-
-
Right now pipeline which reports coverage to coverall.io is broken. Need to find a good, lightweight pipeline runner and resurrect the coverage.
-
- [ ] for functional tests
- [ ] for unit tests
-
Looking through some of the CVID cases and seeing some odd results with coverage. For the variant shown below, the tool tip states the coverage as 9, 12 and 6 for the three sample, but the coverage tr…
-
So, one thing our company likes to see is code coverage numbers. I'd love to see this plugin enable support for this.
Mainly, I'd like to see two things:
* Code coverage indicators by the line nu…
-
Test coverage is being reported as:
```
Statements : 100% ( 79/79 ), 3 ignored
Branches : 96.15% ( 75/78 ), 12 ignored
Functions : 100% ( 20/20 ), 1 ignored
Lines : 100% ( 38/38…
-
I'm using Infrabox to show the coverage report of my unit tests and it's great, but it'd be even greater if the there was an improvement in the UI. Currently it's a little difficult to do any analysis…
-
We never calculated coverage because it was always tricky to configure Jacoco on a project that uses Jacoco as a dependency. But maybe we can make it work! We're all curious about what code coverage w…
-
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [518358](https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=518358) |
| Status | NEW |
| Importance | P3 normal |
| Reported | Jun 16, 2017 05:40 EDT |
| Modified | Feb…