-
See https://github.com/ropensci-review-tools/pkgcheck-action, recommended by rOpenSci
-
Not sure if it's in scope or not because of the narrow geographical range, but it might be worthwhile putting in a [pre-submission inquiry](https://devguide.ropensci.org/authors-guide.html)
-
- [x] open a parallel branch for revs
- [x] update readme: include more on the description? the main functions?
The README has be substantially updated and now documents the package's main functio…
-
blog post idea. Just like Max's how the Dat team works (https://github.com/maxogden/async-team/blob/master/readme.md) perhaps we could do one for rOpenSci too, with more details on our stack. If what…
-
http://ropensci.org/blog/2016/03/17/ropensci-geospatial-stack
Useful summary of geospatial data tools by rOpenSci group. Including a new landsat package. Should be generally useful.
-
see https://ropensci.r-universe.dev/builds
apparently an installation problem?
-
@assignUser what do you think of this? Any experience? I don’t have, but I think it would fit in.
-
Hi @timriffe ,
I wonder if you would be interested in submitting `HMDHFDplus` to [rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/about/). This package would definitely fit in the desired package categories (see ht…
-
See https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding/issues/6, courtesy of @stewid
- [x] Change DESCRIPTION:Title to title case
- [x] List author(s) of included software.
- [x] List copyright(s) of included sof…
-
We seem to have a mix of styles: Google's R style guide and some other style. We should convert all to use ropensci's style: https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding/blob/master/packaging_guide.md. They…