-
This app is now sufficiently complete to satisfy all required functionality; I'll update the issue if I update the app. /cc @codepathreview @thecodepath
-
### Context
Review this PR https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/110
### What needs to get done
1. Review https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/110
### Definition of Done
…
-
### Context
Review this PR https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/109
### What needs to get done
1. Review https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/109
### Definition of Done
…
-
### Context
Review this PR https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/115
### What needs to get done
1. Review https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/115
### Definition of Done
…
-
### Why are we doing this?
[Code review]( https://programming.codeyourfuture.io/how-this-works/sprints/self-evaluate/prep/#code-review) is an essential part of self-evaluation.
Get a code review for …
-
Issues in this epic are for rules that have a Needs Review portion of the rule that triggers. The intent of these issues is to determine if we can tighten the scope on these scenarios so that they tri…
-
Internal Reference: SURE-9250
The working of the retention settings for RKE2 and S3 is not accurate and needs to be reviewed and updated to be clear on what the settings actually mean.
nwmac updated
22 hours ago
-
Part of this is policy, but here's my guess on the behavior regarding emails:
- An author should only receive one email when they first upload. Subsequent re-uploads should not generate a new email…
-
### Context
Review this PR https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/114
### What needs to get done
1. Review https://github.com/canonical/pipelines-rocks/pull/114
### Definition of Done
…
-
### Context
Review this PR https://github.com/canonical/kubeflow-rocks/pull/130
### What needs to get done
1. Review https://github.com/canonical/kubeflow-rocks/pull/130
### Definition of Done
1.…