-
> Clients still need to perform some verification of oblivious DoH servers,
such as the TLS certificate check described in {{DDR}}. This certificate
check can be done when looking up the configurati…
-
Starting from October 3, 2022 (Beijing Time), more than 100 users reported that at least one of their TLS-based censorship circumvention servers had been blocked. The TLS-based circumvention protocols…
-
Some options include: only allow common DoH paths (such as the de-facto default "/dns-query{?dns}");
performing consistency checks by fetching the information about the resolver over multiple resolut…
-
**Motivation**
Recently Apple started using Oblivious DNS over HTTPS for their Private Relay Feature. It would be good to have this support.
**Describe the solution you'd like.**
Similar to other…
-
### Affected page
https://www.privacyguides.org/en/advanced/dns-overview/
### Description
The page is missing information about the ODoH protocol. Can the website be updated to include an explanati…
-
From Ben Schwartz:
> The use of the name "oblivious" for the SvcParam has the potential to create a conflict or ambiguity. For example, we risk creating confusion if someone defines "Oblivious CoA…
-
Ralf Weber pointed out the DNS media type we mention is application/dns-message. We likely need a specific type defined for doing DNS-over-OHTTP (slightly different from the previous ODoH type) that w…
-
_Comment by @paulwouters_
I think it would be good to add a section on how DNS works with ohttp. Eg to clarify whether the lookup is performed by the Client (and hopefully uses DoH or oDoH on its own…
-
Release 2.1.2:
Support for DoH over HTTP/3 (DoH3, HTTP over QUIC) has been added. Compatible servers will automatically use it. Note that QUIC uses UDP (usually over port 443, like DNSCrypt) instea…
-
### Operating System
DietPi
### Architecture
32-bit
### Platform
Windows, Linux
### Project
Aduard Home, Unbound, DNScrypt
### Browser
Edge
### Issue
Not working
##…