-
Hey, sitting here in Web Annotations breakout with @tantek, and chatting w/ Social Web WG previously - it seems like both groups are using "@id" and "@type" without legacy data issues (you don't have …
-
Original implementations of LDN used/s the `solid-terms` namespace e.g., the `inbox` property which points to the Inbox URL. The spec considers to move this over to the `ldp` namespace. This issue is …
-
As briefly discussed at f2f; assuming there's a separate spec for describing content objects.
Presumably including objects which extend Content (Article, Document, Audio, Image, Video, Note, Page, Qu…
-
The ActivityStreams vocabulary has many of the same basic features as ours, although the Annotation model adds significant value in the target area of SpecificResources. This issue exists to track th…
-
See [this comment](https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/232#issuecomment-153398566) for context (heh).
Given that it's vague and the key has conflicting meanings in the docu…
-
reported by @pfps via: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Nov/0025.html
> I also noticed that NaturalLanguageValue has the wrong superclass - it should be languaged typed string.
-
Many of the Activities come in pairs, such as Create/Delete, Add/Remove, Like/Dislike. The documentation makes no explicit link between these pairs.
Proposal is that these links should be made expl…
-
I'm making this separate issue from [my earlier question](https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/134#issuecomment-108122077) to @elf-pavlik on #134. But I welcome feedback from…
-
In Protocol we refer to:
http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#annotationService
Given the namespace, this is part of the ontology, and should be defined somewhere. Or it should not have the namespace as its pr…
-
JSON-LD's media type has a profile parameter which would allow to convey the same information as a separate media type. The processing model of application/ld+json isn't changed but the document confo…