-
Netatalk has been very good recently. It's been updated and combed through V2 to make it more modern and fix a lot of issues over the years.
However most people these days will find that we may be…
-
The project includes the BSD-3-clause license and refers to it as "BSD license".
Please do not use this term, as there are 3 different licenses (BSD-4-clause, BSD-3-clause and BSD-2-clause) that coul…
-
This issue is for discussion about licensing of the project and the Juvix runtime. The desired license for the runtime is Apache 2.0 so that there's no issue with programs linking against it. It might…
-
The README shows Perl's GPL/Artistic license, while modules list BSD license in POD.
-
README.md says BSD-2-Clause:
https://github.com/ruby/irb/blob/08eee25d28365e4fb2e11432c0535932f586cca3/README.md?plain=1#L411-L413
Also the LICENSE.txt is is BSD-2-Clause:
https://github.com/…
voxik updated
2 months ago
-
Hello,
I would like to program with Choco Solver, however the license is holding me back.
On the Internet I read:
"BSD 4-Clause License.
Like 3-Clause, additionally with the obnoxious BSD adver…
-
I was wondering if an actual “BSD 2-Clause License” could be put in the LICENSE file rather than just the words “BSD 2-Clause License” itself. The LICENSE file is malformed and doesn’t actually contai…
-
This project seems really cool and vital to Blink1. If this is the offical SDK for it, it would be great to see this offer a BSD or MIT style license as well. The CC-BY-SA is not bad, but there is s…
-
Given this input .cpp file:
```cpp
// Copyright (c) FIRST and other WPILib contributors.
// Open Source Software; you can modify and/or share it under the terms of
// the WPILib BSD license file i…
-
Code without any license are very hard to sell to anyone (in many senses). This was brought up in Slack. Any thoughts?
Most of Hackage is licensed under BSD-3. Source: http://neilmitchell.blogspot.…