-
With #281 we added CI test coverage for ZKAPAuthorizer vs a supposedly-recent version of Tahoe-LAFS master. For this to actually be a recent version, it needs to be updated sometimes. At the moment,…
-
There is currently no way to resolve a conflict via changes to the filesystem (even after #725 is landed).
We need a specification and documentation as well an implementation (that works alongside …
-
Work in progress - please contribute. See ipfs/apps#40.
This will probably be done with Keybase/kbfs or Tahoe-LAFS
-
Does Gridsync have any proxy support? I have read that it has very preliminary Tor support, but it seems to me that an option for either HTTP or SOCKS is an essential feature.
Apparently, tahoe-laf…
sayge updated
6 years ago
-
This is the automatic monitoring of (some) Tahoe-LAFS-level functionality for all storage servers.
daira updated
7 years ago
-
Could you provide a whitepaper? Not a bunch of different whitepapers, but the whitepaper about this project. And could you clarify, what is the difference (and pros and cons) between drogulus and its …
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Mount tahoe-lafs filesystem via fuse expose
2. Copy lots of files, until there are not enough storage nodes accepting shares
3. Next files are silently co…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Mount tahoe-lafs filesystem via fuse expose
2. Copy lots of files, until there are not enough storage nodes accepting shares
3. Next files are silently co…
-
Hi,
Would you please have a look at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841581
It looks like the build fails because of this include directive: https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/pycry…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Mount tahoe-lafs filesystem via fuse expose
2. Copy lots of files, until there are not enough storage nodes accepting shares
3. Next files are silently co…