-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
## Feature request
For agricultural rovers, it would be very nice to have the Copter's ZigZag mode work on the Rover platform.
One time setup (per field):
record position 'A' and 'B' only once …
-
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32625059/64921660-5afe7e80-d7f8-11e9-91b0-591100bd1d62.png)
-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
```
Please add a "clearance height" parameter to zig zag operation.
Currently it is hard-coded to 20
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `danhe...@gmail.com` on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:50
-
Robot tips when changing directions.
Consider if derivative control in the PID could help ease the change in velocity.
....
Looks like the profiled pod controller we have already implemented shoul…