-
#### Description of the problem
Perhaps I do not understand some concepts of type classes correctly, but in the example below I do not understand why Coq expects a type `@inner_fa A (fun _ : A => P…
-
Note: the issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github tool
Original bug ID: BZ#1214
From: @roconnor
Reported version: trunk
CC: @pirbo
-
#### Description of the problem
In large proof, I was able to get an evar instantiated by an ill-typed term. I minimized it down the following example:
```coq
Require Import ZArith.
Open Scope…
aa755 updated
3 years ago
-
For a theoritical understanding, please refer :
https://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~teb/phys481l/relkin.pdf
To get a rough idea, have a look at the relativistic particle-in-cell simulation of laser part…
-
Use case
----------------------------------------
In module merge, we prove sth like this:
`ctx [ModTuple mdl mdr] >= ctx[mdl ++ mdr]`
Here, source's `Midx.t`s are `ctx ++ mdl` while target's are …
-
As a first step, I need to understand how the feature is supposed to work for various cases. Then figure out what's been broken in 8.15.
Attn: @gares
-
We have the following in the style guide:
> Always use Coq's proof structuring syntax ( { } + - * ) to focus on a single goal immediately after a tactic creates additional goals.
Coq has the follo…
nmvdw updated
2 years ago
-
Given a value `x`, is there a way to get the result of `Eval native_compute in x` together with a proof that this result is equal to `x`, without needing to run the native compiler twice?
In the c…
-
Note: the issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github tool
Original bug ID: BZ#5415
From: @RalfJung
Reported version: 8.6
CC: @ejgallego, @gares
-
Made some progress since originally posting. I now found out there is a world interaction upgrade which went trough a rename, making it harder to find.
Right now I am about to give up on this mod, …