-
Hi, I encounter the same problem as in https://github.com/facebookresearch/LAMA/issues/10.
And I found the reason why 2 examples are filtered is that the `obj_label` are `1970s` and `1990s`. And in `ā¦
-
The module haze removal works quite well, the only thing is that is reduces the luminosity of the image.
This isn't a problem if all the image is involved, but when a mask is used it's quite annoyiā¦
-
I just upgraded from 5.8 to 5.9, and when I load a raw with a profile previously created in 5.8, and haze removal was set, the saturation being set to 100 by default changes the look of the image. If ā¦
-
Leave below as comments your memos that grapple with the topic of climate change, inspired by the readings (Synthesis report from IPCC5, IPCC Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5Ā°C, Bill McKibben's āā¦
-
### Describe the bug
The exported photo didn't include metadata like EXIF.
However it works properly sometimes. I have had a hard time to figure out which setting could solve the issue.
### Steps ā¦
-
### Requirements
- [X] Is this a bug report? For questions or discussions use https://lemmy.ml/c/lemmy_support
- [X] Did you check to see if this issue already exists?
- [X] Is this only a singleā¦
-
**To Reproduce**
_Please provide detailed steps to reproduce the behaviour, for example:_
1. Go to haze removal
2. Set the distance to a small value (I was using 0.062)
3. Export the image
4. Comā¦
-
**Describe the bug/issue**
I've found out that the export module has extremely inconsistent performance when exporting JPGs.
As you can see in the attached pictures below, simply changing the "set sā¦
-
First I'll pre-apologize for not being GIT trained enough to do this myself.
I have a little write up of an enhanced version of the haze removal tool (attached).
I simply overwrote the previous ā¦
-
Running 4.3+ 104 on Windows... - values blur the image but pos values on the slider do nothing.
I saw this reported on FB when I was at work...my machine there had 4.3 + 65 and dehaze seemed to woā¦