-
As I mentioned in one of the recently closed PR's, this repo seems to be missing a license file.
According to @MarkehMe it should be LGPLv3, is this correct? I want to ensure that I send you a PR for…
-
Hi there!
While packaging pyfakewebcam for NixOS, I noticed that there is an inconsistency in the license. LICENSE.txt is LGPLv3 while setup.py lists GPLv3. Would you please be able to clarify whic…
-
GPLv3 is not so friendly to make use of it for in-process plugin. Would you mind to relicense it to something like LGPL ?
-
Hello,
The README states MIT (`EEIoT works under the MIT license. For more information see here.`).
While the link supplied in the README and the LICENSE file report LGPLv3.
What is the intended …
-
trying to regenerate cgen-created files in the opcodes subdirectory fails with the following error:
```
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -w run-cgen arch=fr30 prefix=fr30 opti…
-
```
Собственно, альфа-версия доступна здесь -
https://gitorious.org/lopyfb2tools
В аттаче - собранный экстэншн (на Gitorious -
только сырцы, без полноценного Питона на
данный момент не собираются, …
-
Hi, thanks for creating this!
I have decided to use a small fork of ktye/k in a computer game project.
My fork is here: https://gitlab.com/talas777/spesh
I only plan to use the C-version and I …
talas updated
9 months ago
-
The DESCRIPTION file lists ggtext as GPLv2 only, so it would be incompatible with packages like assertthat, clipr, DT, forecast, profvis, and whisker.
Is this incompatibility intentional or could t…
-
The inclusion of all licenses for the Python runtime components is very nice.
However, the licenses of the Python packages built into the binary is just as important - possibly even more so because…
-
Those .rar files at least for the Python version do not contain a single mention of your company. Are they really containing the modified source?
Also, please do not upload the .rar files, but rath…