-
For `RelativisticOrbital`s, the kinetic operator is actually given by
and this needs to be taken into account. This could explain some deviations in orbital energies observed for the Xenon pseu…
jagot updated
4 years ago
-
**Describe the bug**
Installation on Google Colab leads to 'unknown exception' errors when calculating integrals through the Python bindings.
**To Reproduce**
```python
import gqcpy
import nu…
-
**Describe the current state of a part of the code**
After #514, we'll have the ability to quantize the Coulomb operator in a general spinor basis. However, I didn't really know (read: spend time) ho…
-
I came across your presentation for 36C3 and was wondering if you started working on TRNG and crypto cores:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3709037/71650373-b60ba100-2d15-11ea-8d8d…
-
**Describe the feature you'd like**
In order to support spin-unrestricted calculations, both ‘unrestricted’ and ‘generalized’, we should be able to:
- [ ] represent different types of two-component…
-
@lelemmen
**Describe the feature you'd like**
A possibility to get the two electron integral tensor in generalised spinor basis.
**Additional context**
This would be a very useful addition, i…
-
**Describe the feature you'd like**
A spinor basis specialized for unrestricted calculations
**Describe what the current code offers in relation to what it lacks**
Currently the code uses two spi…
-
It could be more conceptually flexible to introduce (derivations) of ONVBasis's instead of FockSpaces.
-
A question for the PySCF team, are there plans to implement (or have someone already implemented) relativistic ECPs with a spin-orbit contribution, for example using Stuttgart's form? I am interested …
-
`#INFO: **** input file is /scratch/a.py ****
from pyscf import gto, scf, dft, tools
mol = gto.Mole()
mol.verbose = 5
mol.cart = True
mol.atom = '''
C -0.403890314 0.636558575 0.000…
tzyii updated
5 years ago