-
*Please use the following format for a ZIM creation request (and delete unnecessary information)*
- Website URL: https://lurkmore.online/
- License: [WTFPL public license](https://lurkmore.online/…
-
This looks like great work. Can you please add one of the following specific licenses?
1. MIT License
2. The Unlicense
3. WTFPL ("Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License")
-
👋 It looks like right now there is no license for the project, please consider adding one. :)
-
Hi,
I'd like to use this in a little project I'm working on at work, and I was wondering if you could clarify the license this code is under. Is it WTFPL like lz-string itself?
Many thanks!
-
As per https://opensource.org/minutes20090304 this was rejected as redundant with Fair license https://opensource.org/licenses/Fair
Would you consider using Fair license or CC0 or X11 or Apache 2.0…
pravi updated
4 months ago
-
hi!
this is a formality, but i think it would be very cool if the libraries template came with a much more liberal license than the gpl (*). people who want could still narrow it down to the (l)gpl,…
-
This is not an issue, this is my praise to you.
I've made something similar, except it's more WTFPL style.
https://github.com/ciafwywcoc/ciafwywcoc/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT
You have my support!
-
Are you planning to add one ?
-
The LGPL license doesn't make sense. Should choose FreeBSD, WTFPL, or GPL (or AGPL, but preferably not). Also need to consider renaming the project to avoid confusion (and possible legal issues) with …
-
The WTFPL is not compatible with more restrictive licences.
best guess till further research:
not compatible with the GPL at all, not even linking.
compatible for linking against Apache/MIT/BSD/L…
Q1712 updated
7 years ago