-
### Feature Request / Improvement
In our contributing guidelines we point people to writing new unit tests using JUni5.
We should consider/evaluate what the best approach would be to eventually m…
-
**Describe the bug**
Assertj has a type confusion and does not properly infer types when nesting `satisfiesAnyOf()` within `allSatisfy()` when one of the type involved extend `Future`.
The code …
-
* assertj core version: 3.24.2
* java version: 11
* test framework version: Junit 5.9.2
* os (if relevant): Linux
The JavaDoc for `hasContent` says "Verifies that the text content of the actual …
-
#### Summary
Hi,
I am migrating from java 8 to 17 and had big trouble getting the generated assertions to work (actually is does not work at all, is it dead?)
But even with great hacks I cannot …
-
Is it possible to use AssertJ assertions instead of Hamcrest in Citrus?
I don't know about Hamrest 2, but compared to 1.3, AssertJ is much better.Also it is updated more frequently and has a very g…
-
### Feature Request / Improvement
We should ensure that test code asserting on exceptions should always check for the underlying exception message as shown below:
```
// should fail because it do…
-
The assertions presented for `File`s are different from the ones for `Path`s, although it may be nice for some users to be able to use them interchangeably.
My suggestion / feature idea would be to…
-
**Describe the bug**
Kotlin compilation fails with `Not enough information to infer type variable T`
* assertj core version: 3.23.1
* Java version: 11
* Kotlin: 1.7.21
It looks like the onl…
-
Hi! I'm comparing assertk to assertj and bumped into innability to find a way to change representations in the assertions message (Assertions.useRepresentation).
Does it exist or is it not yet impl…
SerVB updated
11 months ago
-
The assertions generated uses `org.assertj.core.util.Objects.areEqual` and `org.assertj.core.util.Objects.areEqualArrays` which are deprecated and show in the applications warning logs.
Should use …