-
**Reported by awad.mukbil on 7 Feb 2017 11:53 UTC**
The compliance checker does not detect errors in the attached FMU (which is, e.g. rejected by Dymola). The attached FMU is an erroneous FMU of…
-
see also https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard/issues/1764
-
Power companies often have custom dynamic models that they are accustomed to using in their simulations. The symbolic modeling features of Andes make it convenient to add new models, but users may wis…
-
Contexts of compilation:
================
- Microsoft Visual Studio Pro 2022 with Linux workload.
- Configuration with vcpkg
a/ Windows 10 mode:
-------------------------
- Compilation on: Loc…
-
First of all, great work! It reads very well and already has a lot of useful content!
The following are notes from a quick read. Sorry that they are all gathered here, but it would be cumbersome to…
-
The following error was raised from sampling the experiment ssp370 r5i1p1f1 2015-2020 data for EC-Earth-Consortium.
**Incorrect activity_id**
For all files, the Global attribute activity_id is ''…
-
The model description which is exported will contain outputs in this format:
``` xml
```
this implies that index 45 and 48 must be of type `output` …
-
When the user runs a SSP model containing several FMUs, some stats on this execution should be interesting for him/her to tune the model.
According to the FMI standard, some states are defined in the…
-
Hi all,
since we just had a discussion about "validating a model implementation with measurement data", the following analogy to FMI co-simulation testing came up.
When the purpose is to test th…
-
Hi all,
The [FMU checker](https://fmu-check.herokuapp.com/) provided in http://fmi-standard.org/ shows some issues when checking the fmu created with `pythonfmu build`.
sunne updated
3 years ago