-
```
GSON always operates on the static type of an object. It has no mechanism to
operate on the object's runtime type.
It would be handy if GsonBuilder permitted a way to specify the known
subclass…
-
```
GSON always operates on the static type of an object. It has no mechanism to
operate on the object's runtime type.
It would be handy if GsonBuilder permitted a way to specify the known
subclass…
-
```
GSON always operates on the static type of an object. It has no mechanism to
operate on the object's runtime type.
It would be handy if GsonBuilder permitted a way to specify the known
subclass…
-
```
GSON always operates on the static type of an object. It has no mechanism to
operate on the object's runtime type.
It would be handy if GsonBuilder permitted a way to specify the known
subclass…
-
```
GSON always operates on the static type of an object. It has no mechanism to
operate on the object's runtime type.
It would be handy if GsonBuilder permitted a way to specify the known
subclass…
-
### Rationale
The first thing I noticed when reading the documentation (I'm actually evaluating this project as a suitable ORM for our own project) was the hard-coded base validators and it's lack of…
-
It would be nice not to see files from e.g. `db/migrate/` inside my Skunk summary output. These files need to exist in a codebase but do not carry any meaningful weight when it comes to that codebase'…
-
My client implements an app. The payment is processed via the PAYONE API directly. Afterwards, an order is created via the Magento SOAP API. The issue is, that this is currently not possible. If one u…
-
## Context
This is a proposal from Google based on our experience consuming schema.org Offer and Organization markup and working with similar data from online merchants. If it were accepted, it wou…
-
```
GSON always operates on the static type of an object. It has no mechanism to
operate on the object's runtime type.
It would be handy if GsonBuilder permitted a way to specify the known
subclass…