-
The README says:
> GNU Library or Lesser General Public License version 2.0 (LGPLv2)
At the same time, at least one file contains the following disclaimer:
https://github.com/jasmineRepo/JAS-m…
-
The gpshell/src/gpshell.c says its license it GPL-v3+ but gpshell/LICENSE suggests it should be LGPL-v3+-with-OpenSSL-exception. Can you clarify this? Since GPL-v3+ may be incompatible with OpenSSL,…
-
PyQt5 is licensed GPL3 or commercial. That can be problematic. Would it be possible to use PySide2 which is LGPLv3 licensed (besides GPLv2 and commercial) and API compatible? This is no legal advice b…
-
The licences of the packages that Sasview relies on aren't accessible/displayable from the app (at least in 5.0.6). There should be a menu item that displays the package dependencies that Sasview bund…
-
```
Собственно, альфа-версия доступна здесь -
https://gitorious.org/lopyfb2tools
В аттаче - собранный экстэншн (на Gitorious -
только сырцы, без полноценного Питона на
данный момент не собираются, …
-
```
Собственно, альфа-версия доступна здесь -
https://gitorious.org/lopyfb2tools
В аттаче - собранный экстэншн (на Gitorious -
только сырцы, без полноценного Питона на
данный момент не собираются, …
-
```
Собственно, альфа-версия доступна здесь -
https://gitorious.org/lopyfb2tools
В аттаче - собранный экстэншн (на Gitorious -
только сырцы, без полноценного Питона на
данный момент не собираются, …
-
Hi,
I noticed that hadroNIO is licensed under GPLv3. Would you consider switching to LGPLv3 so I can integrate it without worries into [invesdwin-context-integration-channel](https://github.com/inves…
-
GPLv3 is not so friendly to make use of it for in-process plugin. Would you mind to relicense it to something like LGPL ?
-
Hello,
Trying to build a RPM package on Fedora 36 using a specfile written from scratch inspired from the template provided here, and not through the proposed makefile and the `make rpm` command l…