-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
This is a proposal to relicense AFCH under the MIT license, the text of which can found [here](http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT). Right now, the script is licensed under CC-BY-SA/GFDL, as it was ori…
-
```
Branch name:
Gamekit revision r1213
Windows 8 with Visual Studio 2012
Feature description:
I am working on integrating a MIT license audio library into Gamekit. So the
android build will be able…
-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
Please add (or update) the license information in the medAL-creator project:
```
This software is distributed under the MIT license (SPDX:MIT)
Copyright (c) 2022 Unisanté - Policlinique médicale u…
-
As discussed at http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/MIT-license-as-default-for-CSL-software-tp7579193p7579395.html, it probably makes sense to relicense all the versions of the CSL schema under…
-
If anyone has any thoughts I'd be open to a discussion. I skimmed through the differences on tldr;legal: my takeaway is they are pretty similar.
-
If we use open-source 3rd party libraries (which we most likely will), the license we use on this repo will have to be the same as the license on that repo.
-
- [x] I have searched through existing issues
- [x] I have read through [docs](https://vuejs.github.io/vetur)
- [x] I have read [FAQ](https://github.com/vuejs/vetur/blob/master/docs/FAQ.md)
## In…
-
Maintainer: @milani
Environment: build system
Description: LuaJIT has a "rolling release" where we should follow git HEAD[1]. I believe that the currently tagged version is tracking code from 2…