-
I would suggest using [formik](https://github.com/jaredpalmer/formik) library to handle forms.
-
I'm wondering a bit about the license change. Now the main LICENSE file specifies that it is now using an Apache 2.0 license, but the packages (package.json files) still seem to indicate an MIT licens…
Tigge updated
2 years ago
-
## Bug report
### Current Behavior
`` accepts any prop, this make it impossible for TS compiler to find typos on props name.
### Expected behavior
IMHO, unexpected props should not be acceptab…
-
## 🚀 Feature request
### Current Behavior
I guess the only way to _type_ Formik forms correctly today is to use TypeScript, but if you don't, you have to declare PropTypes manually (unless I'm m…
-
I have a Formik form validation working fine with my form, but one of the areas of the form is actually an imported Class component containing a huge editor that I wrote with React Slate. I'd like som…
-
Is it possible to use RN + Formik and mask inside the ?
-
i have a field set to an empty string in `invitalValues` , but in my `validation` , I noticed `formik` passed me `undefined` instead.
I thought it is a but but after digging into source code, I …
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
The signup/login page only have HTML validation.(the required attribute,)
**Describe the solution you'd like**
with For…
-
## 🐛 Bug report
It looks like at one point, the FormikErrors type allowed errors to be type `any`, which was added in bug #266, to support i18n frameworks. But over the course of a couple of TypeSc…
-
I can't think of a reason these wouldn't be a good default to have. Every project has forms, and these are prob the accepted preferred tools out there.