-
**Issue:** As discussed in multiple forums, CNTT currently specifies hardware in multiple documents (e.g., RM, RA and RI), making alignment challenging. Further, when RI/CIRV (or CSPs) are procuring h…
-
-
**Comment from Paris Meeting: Chapter 03 Infrastructure Abstraction - GAPS (Day 1):**
**VNF/CNF**
VNFs/CNFs are not managing their own resources via API-s.
VNFs and CNFs are using different …
-
As discussed in Prague, we need to decide on the base OpnStack version for RA-1 and RI-1.
-
The diagram in section 3.1 ([link](https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/blob/master/doc/ref_model/chapters/chapter03.md#31-model)) suggests that the "management software" is part of the NFVI. Is this not th…
-
- do we need a new networking work-stream or are we going to have networking details spread out between different RAs?
- Request received from Oya (VF).
-
Control instance for the management of network services and VNFs based on machine topology defined in the portal.
-
## Preliminary questions [Required]
### Disable all the other extensions except for LaTeX Workshop, and check that you still see this issue. [Required]
You still see this issue?: Yes
### Make…
-
We need to integrate the wrapper with the NBI to receive instantiation requests. To that end, the following steps have to be performed:
Topic: infrastructure.k8s.function.deploy:
- [x] Define the…
-
Regarding Policy Rules UI , right now they include 3 columns,
- name
- value
- inertia
but the end user does not understand which vnf this action will be applied , neither the monitoring rule…