-
Since we're in es6 (soon to also be typescript) it would be nice to take advantage of rollup's benefits in bundle size.
Right now it's not too feasible since we'd want rxjs to come along for the ride…
-
I'm currently profiling a cyclejs app and scope hoisting is not possible with xstream because of missing ES6 build.
The problem is again with the extra imports. The same problem we had with `@cycle…
-
# Roadmap DRAFT
> [!NOTE]
> This is still a work in-progress, some items may change.
## Short Term Goal
- [ ] CI
- [x] Promote NPM releases using automation (Nightly releases)
- [ ] Im…
-
- goal: to use `` tag in routes
- goal: not needing controllers
- goal: route-based tree-shaking (currently accomplished by Embroider shipping its own version of the router but these should be combine…
-
I would like to test a [React](https://reactjs.org/) + [ViteJS](https://vitejs.dev/) project setup, with this structure:
- `services/app_a/`
- `services/app_b/`
- `services/shared/`
-
https://github.com/birdofpreyru/react-utils/blob/46b8b420ef0fded9165b2928434e581ef34a6c31/config/webpack/lib-base.js#L118
1. As per [the warning in latest Webpack docs](https://webpack.js.org/configu…
-
**Please describe the feature/suggestion**
It would be awesome if we can run this again a local package. That way we could verify we are tree-shaking properly before publishing a module to `npm`.
…
-
redux-observable 0.18 uses rxjs v5 or rxjs v6 + rxjs-compact. This causes that all operators are included in the bundle without tree shaking.
Is it possible to release v0.19 and use rxjs v6 only?
…
lstkz updated
6 years ago
-
libraries should be built with babel w/o webpack
- webpack build broke tree-shaking in projects
- webpack build broke sourcemaps
- webpack team does not propose to use webpack for libraries
…
-