-
I would like to develop a commercial application.
I have seen that the license is the MIT license, so if I am not wrong, I can use this library or the source code for commercial applications. Is th…
-
### Is there an existing proposal for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing proposals
### Is your feature request related to a problem?
I have an issue utilizing the flamegraph and table output …
-
Switching this library to a dual license model of MIT and Apache 2.0 to follow other open source crates in the Rust ecosystem would be nice.
-
### Is there an existing issue for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues
### Issue Description
I want to work on designing the MIT license page and Code of Conduct page present in the foo…
-
Hi, thank you for this work and the source code!
Regarding the MIT license of this repo -- if you have used FDDB/WIDERFace dataset for training your models (which are provided only for the research…
-
The "license" property in the package.json is not correctly set. Thereby the library is regarded as "unlicensed" by tools like e.g. Snyk.
I created a PR to solve this: https://github.com/mikejihbe/…
-
WTFPL is highly discouraged and not recommended due to its bad language and no warranty disclaimer. I suggest we re-license the whole mod to MIT or the Unlicense, but I'm not sure if we have to ask al…
-
I found something that looks like an MIT license in the source tree, but I'm not sure if that applies to only those files or the entire project - might it make more sense to add a LICENSE file at the …
-
Where are we at on the licensing change? This was up to the PI discussing with legal.
-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59