-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
```
src\swfobject.js has not Copyright notices.
Is it Licensor is Adobe,same as "express Install"?
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jumnichi...@gmail.com` on 6 Jan 2014 at 6:59
-
Hi, I found this repo use MIT License
I didn't see the license description, and I found two repos you fork from
https://github.com/tsawler/laravel-filemanager
https://github.com/UniSharp/laravel-…
-
We've approved that all components must be distributed under the MIT License.
However, the MIT License requires a copyright holder.
I think we should keep it simple and not reference the CONTRIB…
-
I was personally a little confused recently when I discovered the `isatty` crate as we'd previously been using this crate for things like rustc and Cargo. Upon [opening an issue](https://github.com/dt…
-
Hello! This is an awesome project! I'm interested in trying it out but the license language isn't standard even though it is very permissive. I was wondering, would you be open to changing the license…
-
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/#
Changing to MIT license would allow this to be used by people like Microsoft, who cannot use GPL licenses since it would force them to open source their co…