-
Hi, great work!
Any plans to add adjoint sensitivities?
Kr, oyvind?
-
The current implementation of adjoint sensitivities is functional, but very poorly optimized. Currently it just evaluates the full derivative function for the domain and then extracts the one derivati…
-
@llfung talked to me today about his work on adjoint-accelerated programmable inference for large PDEs, and what would be needed on Turing's part to support that. As I understand it (and I know very l…
-
**Describe the bug 🐞**
The `sensealg` in solve is ignored, currently it only follows the sensealg defined in the problem
Looks like, the sensealg is not in the prob.kwargs, and is ignored in the…
-
**Describe the bug 🐞**
Taking the gradient with respect to a vector of parameter values (which are replaced into the parameter object) is not working
with `MTKParameters`
**Expected behavior**
…
-
Hi,
I am trying to replicate the following paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-01
Here are the codes I have for parameter fitting. The last version of PEtab worked ok but I cannot rep…
-
Hi, could you please help me out
In Matlab when I run steady-state sensitivities in the case of _adjoint_ sensitivities
```
options_ss.sensi_meth = 'adjoint';
```
_sllh_ vector has **all** zeroes…
-
Hi,
I would like to consider stress in my topology optimization. This sets up a two part question:
First to the calculation:
I am using volume elements small_displacement_simp (based on small_d…
-
It would be awesome if we could directly control the error on of the sensitivities through `solve`, e.g. `solve(...; adjoint_abstol=1e-6, adjoint_reltol=1e-6)`.
-
The adjoint sensitivities are slightly off for Hz polarization. We should fix.