-
Not sure if this is intended or by accident
MIT license specified in LICENSE file https://github.com/jmrivas86/django-json-widget/blob/a111908cf2ce7410ba65e0d69bee442d6681e5a5/LICENSE#L2
BSD licen…
-
### Steps to Reproduce
Hi. I'm packaging this for Debian, and we are going through license statements. The pemutil/ssh.go file begins with:
```
// Copyright 2012 The Go Authors. All rights rese…
-
It looks like that python-control (BSD license) relies on slycot (GPL license). Shouldn't python-control be released under GPL license as well?
-
**Akzeptanzkriterien SHOULD**
If you are free to choose your OSS license, go with the OSS license [21] [BSD-3-Clause](https://github.com/MeteoSwiss/opendata-explorer?tab=BSD-3-Clause-1-ov-file#readme…
-
We get "BSD" in package.xml. There are multiple variants of the BSD license. Which specific one applies to our project? BSD-3-Clause?
-
We get "BSD" in package.xml. There are multiple variants of the BSD license. Which specific one applies to our project? BSD-3-Clause?
-
We get "BSD" in package.xml. There are multiple variants of the BSD license. Which specific one applies to our project? BSD-3-Clause?
-
there may be use-cases where people want to re-distribute this library with all its dependencies.
some (optional/transitive) dependencies might be licensed under GPL, which prevents an assembled re-d…
-
### How can the team help?
I'm in the process of packaging this Ansible Collection for Fedora and RHEL, however our scanner has flagged that the `
plugins/module_utils` directory is `BSD-2-Clause`…
-
I have discovered that the original EasyModbus source code https://github.com/rossmann-engineering/EasyModbusTCP.Java is licensed under GPL v3, and not a BSD license like the code in the SGr repositor…