-
See
- #41
- #39
Some
But
- BSD-licensed
- BSD licensed
- BSD license
- BSD licenses
- BSD licensed
- license BSD
- licenses BSD
- licensed BSD
- dual-licensed BSD
…
-
The `packaging` module has multiple licenses, Apache and BSD. When using the `--with-license-file` with the module in question, the result is as follow:
> packaging
24.0
Apache Software License; …
-
The fix for issue #54 unconditionally places an `OR` operator between all detected licenses from a `pom.xml` file, however there are cases where there is indeed ambiguity and the Maven conjunction rul…
-
Thank you for the library, I really appreciate its flexibility!
## About this issue
For some libraries, the BSD license is presented with some code (`
-
As the title suggests, we should discuss the positives and negatives of the different licenses.
UCSC prefers MIT and BSD. Apache is better for patents I believe.
From [Max Xiong at StackExchange](h…
-
Historically:
(1) Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. Long Time Scale Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations without Lattice Approximation and Predefined Event Table. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115 (21), 9657–9666. https:…
-
Licensing issue:
-----------------
According to the first sentence at https://github.com/OWASP/java-html-sanitizer/blob/main/COPYING, there is a multi-licensing between Apache-2.0 and BSD-3-Clause…
-
## Environment
* Operating system: macOS Somona
* System architecture: Intel
* Panda3D version: latest from the repo
-
The first line of the "COPYING" file says "You may use under either the Apache License Version 2.0 or the BSD
3-Clause License." however, the included BSD license in that file is the 2-Clause BSD.
…
-
Can someone clarify which BSD license (2,3 or 4 clause) this is licensed under?
Thanks!