-
Given the nature of the project we should change the license to `MPL-2.0`.
@Grufoony @NotLudovico can you comment with "yes" to confirm that you agree (IANAL but this is needed because `GPL` is copyl…
-
### 你当前使用的halo版本
2.0.0
### 你当前使用的主题版本
2.0.5
### 你的建议是否涉及到一些现有的问题?
版权声明: 本站所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 许可协议。
上面这种
像这种可以改成转载的或者自定义的吗
### …
-
## Problem
Presently the language of "deed" and "legal code" is output as part of the title styling of the page, and as such causes confusion as visitors may believe that they are part of the license…
-
LICENSE_WEIGHTS [CC-BY-NC 4.0]
As said in here, it is only for NON-COMMERCIAL purpose ,but the overall LICENSE comes under MIT [which is open for commercial purpose] ,so the question is , Has the W…
-
PR #756 changed the license for wg-easy from a short hand-rolled license to CC BY-NC-SA-4.0.
The previous license explicitly stated that users may 'use this software for a company' but that they m…
-
Hello, you set license of this project to GPL which allows commercial use but original license is non-commercial see https://github.com/yisol/IDM-VTON/issues/13
so both are not compatible in my opini…
-
### Describe the bug
From this [HN thread](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40478921): the Diffusion Transformer pipeline code includes a license `Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC …
-
# LICENSE: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | Emily Riederer
My posts are released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
[https://emilyriederer.netlify.app/license/]…
-
Currently the default license is empty. Our terms of use say that unless otherwise specified the license is CC BY-NC-SA-4.0, it would probably be better to set this explicitly by default.
-
# Option 2 – the list of licenses
When selecting _Copyright_ ↦ _Option 2_, a list of licenses is presented, which seems to be slightly arbitrary.
As _Option 1_ provides the intersection of licen…