-
### Comment:
From #69:
For removing `--cov-fail-under`:
> I don't really think it's the place of a feedstock to be failing because the upstream repo doesn't have sufficient testing (I think
> cove…
-
@RedYetiDev The coverage thresholds are super nice :1
Would this make sense?
`node --test-coverage=90`
... which applies equal threshold `90` to line, branch, function or is that too m…
-
**What happened**:
Building Dive on Arch Linux's PKGBUILD failed with insufficient test coverage:
```
==> Starting check()...
/bin/bash: line 1: git: command not found
mkdir -p ./.tmp
Runnin…
-
Let's use https://about.codecov.io/ consistently across repos and also increase threshold for failed checks.
- [ ] https://github.com/neurobagel/tools/issues/7
- [ ] https://github.com/neurobagel/api…
-
Version: Deno 2.0.4
```
$ deno add npm:debug
Add npm:debug@4.3.7
error: Failed to install from package.json
Caused by:
0: Invalid version requirement
1: Unexpected character.
…
-
My vitest has the following configuration:
```
export default defineConfig({
test: {
coverage: {
reporter: process.env.GITHUB_ACTIONS
? ['json', 'json-summary']
: ['…
-
Best action and up to date, thanks a lot. Would be nice if you could add a code coverage threshold.
-
Starting with Node.js 22.8.0 (https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/78ee90e5d90f4cd3d1921bd96cbac829fee3d7f0) the "without intl" coverage workflow started failing due to ["does not meet the global thr…
-
Thanks for this really nice package. Here is a small feature request: I think it would be useful to have a simple way of including a minimum coverage threshold that is required for a function to retur…
-
use cases:
* fail on unexecuted files
* starting to do unit tests in a big project, overall coverage is low - but we can increase per file coverage more easily