-
Investigate the above
-
This is a meta issue documenting the migration of BITs build-system which currently do use `make`.
The folder structure will migrate to the [`src` layout](https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tut…
-
Now that [PEP 621](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0621/) is final we will eventually need to support it.
This might be tricky since PEP 621 is not flexible enough to provide the same set of fe…
-
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0621/ standardizes storing project metadata in `pyproject.toml`. We basically do the same thing already, so it would involve reading a different key and deprecating…
-
I learned about this project recently while reading up on [PEP 621](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0621/#dependencies-optional-dependencies) and [PEP 665](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0665…
-
### Description
I was expecting bump-my-version to be able to read
```toml
[project]
version = "1.0.0"
```
But it did not. If a `current_version` isn't specified, IMO this should be the fa…
-
`PEP 8` is now the standard for Python packages since a decade, and it might limit and make more difficult the usage of the code. Here, I also suggest to comply to the `PEP 621` standards, which remov…
-
I know you already support poetry and pipenv, but I would like to request the following feature to support [PDM](https://pdm.fming.dev/) to.
Supporting official [PEP-621](https://www.python.org/dev/p…
-
As prototyped in #646, I believe this repo is a nice place to house a general parsing and validation function for the PEP 621 `[project]` table in the `pyproject.toml`.
This returns a list of (buil…
-
### In PEP 621 is the dynamic stuff, is there any plan to support it for dependencies and optional-dependencies?
- How is this important to you? How would you use it?
- we have built a backend…