-
It looks like RFCs are not licensed under any license. I propose to consult this case with RFCs authors and add a standard license such as Ruby/MIT or CC-BY license.
-
### Describe the issue
If you open Statistics and select "RFCs" as Document type, then the result for any option in "Authors" row is empty. For "All" or "Internet-drafts" Document types the statistic…
-
If so, we'll need to specify exactly the wording changes that are being made to RFC9330 & 9331.
From https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/XNNyrMOLvqxqPVPuZsWPwwlCCVk/
> [GW2] The only upd…
-
I've long had an idea for starting a JSON-LD Request For Comment "RFC" system. Similar to PEPs, JEPs, XEPs, EIPs, and so on in other projects. The idea being to have a collection of docs that propos…
-
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11746742/67744903-be1d3b00-fa5d-11e9-8c4b-4fcc04af4ac7.png)
图片用 OmniGraffle 画的,附件如下,欢迎修改
[blowcode.zip](https://github.com/alitajs/blowcode/files/3…
-
The Fellowship commits to the implementation of each merged RFC. Currently many of the RFCs are implemented by their creators, but this cannot be assumed in general. Especially not for external RFCs (…
-
Reported by Jeff Haas on [tools-discuss](https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/OeWikCiYU2utlqYhAWbP6zQcAgQ/)
>Consider the following:
>
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?sub…
-
RFC
-
牛马夕阳红战队
想做个牛B闪闪的事儿
-
Which browsers use which specification?
E.g. Chrome 46 is compliant with RFC 7231 and transitively with RFC 3986, but not with RFC 2616 nor transitively with RFC 2396.