-
Would be great to have Spock support. I am very willing to make a contribution.
Is there anything I should be aware of before digging into the problem?
-
**Describe the bug**
The feature from assertj/assertj#2520 seems to be incompatible with using the `StringAssert`from assertj-core in a Groovy and Spock setup.
The `then` block in a spock test fe…
-
### Description
Currently using `@QuarkusTest` in a spock test case is not supported by `Quarkus` #6506
This is caused by Spock using its own extension mechanism, and not handle JUnit5 annotations…
-
I am using spock in my grails project. I wan to run the test classes in a sequence order. When I run all the test cases in a package it runs randomly. I am using linux os. How can we run the test clas…
-
## Description
Liquibase currently uses an older version of spock, groovy and junit. They all interact with each other and may need to be upgraded together. Extensions also consume our test objects…
-
### Module
None
### Problem
Spock is always released against the multiple Major versions of Groovy. For example [version 2.3 has been released for Groovy 2.5, 3,0 and 4.0](https://central.sonatype.…
-
The readme tells to use `@RunWith(ArquillianSputnik.class)`.
That means to me, this is not compatible with Spock 2.x which is not JUnit 4 based anymore.
Spock 2.x is a JUnit 5 platform engine, so th…
-
For example:
In such info summaries and credit screens, it's shorter and m…
-
👋 Hello! I'm wondering if anyone has successfully gotten Spock working with GPG or knows of any workarounds besides disabling commit signing. Right now, commits don't work and I keep getting this erro…
-
Split in Spock and Spock Standalone
Wait due to https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-testrunner-spock/issues/18