issues
search
Arakula
/
A09
A09 6800/6801/6809/6309/68HC11 Assembler
GNU General Public License v2.0
40
stars
8
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
FBG * option not working as expected
#21
phillipeaton
opened
3 months ago
0
More a suggestion than a bug
#20
Wawavoun
opened
5 months ago
0
a09 does not honor END statement with transfer address
#19
mickecamino
closed
6 months ago
3
PSH B, PSH A, PUL A, PUL B not valid 6800 instructions although LDA A, CMP A etc all are handled the same as LDAA, CMPA
#18
stanleyruppert
closed
9 months ago
2
6309 xIM indirect addressing not understood
#17
mjwurtz
opened
10 months ago
0
SET directive does not allow give a label a new value
#16
kees1948
opened
1 year ago
0
Bug in CMPA 0,X
#15
mickecamino
opened
1 year ago
4
fix FILCHR, the FILCHR directive was ignored after last commit
#14
AR1972
closed
1 year ago
1
Last commit breaks FILCHR
#13
AR1972
closed
1 year ago
4
binary output from 6800 code missing first 48 bytes (zeroes) - yet .lst, s19 and intel output all correct
#12
stanleyruppert
closed
9 months ago
2
a09 fails now on 6909 code "LDA A,X"
#11
dieterdeyke
closed
2 years ago
4
Spaced out register names in Motorola User Group code triggers "undefined label" error
#10
ExileInParadise
closed
2 years ago
3
Unary ! and ~ operators
#9
raybellis
closed
4 years ago
17
Nested macro calls get repeated
#8
raybellis
closed
4 years ago
14
Errors using local labels
#7
raybellis
closed
4 years ago
7
Could use an OPT to specify the filler for "UNUSED" space
#6
raybellis
closed
4 years ago
5
a09 won't take OPT without leading tab
#5
raybellis
closed
4 years ago
5
HD63B03 support?
#4
raybellis
closed
4 years ago
5
Compiler Warnings
#3
SteveFosdick
closed
5 years ago
2
Port to MacOS
#2
stevebyan
closed
5 years ago
3
Label on the same line as a macro is not defined
#1
gordonjcp
closed
8 years ago
4