Open serozhenka opened 1 month ago
Hey @serozhenka , great feedback! It's actually on my TODO list for v 1.0.0 to introduce an asyncio client.
I plan to introduce it before v.1.0 so there's a transition period where both asyncio and the threading solution with the _async()
functions can be used.
Sounds great! Do you have an approximate ETA of when can I expect it to be ready?
aiming for Q4 2024
Using asyncio will be greatly beneficial in the use case of transcription as most of the time the client waits for a response on a socket when your servers are doing all the great work.
concurrent.futures implementation still works but is not as good for two main reasons:
Hope for positive feedback on that!